It’s just the 500 lb gorilla in the room, stupid

And I don’t mean Kagen. It’s the other hairy, hulking, reeally obvious hot potato everyone is tip toeing around.

The White House is denying it. Politico is denying it. 40 paid witnesses are denying it. Fox Snooze is afraid to mention it. They know what’s up and they’re just bustin’ at the seems hoping someone else breaks the story because they’re too chicken to say it and it’s such a great story! It took me about 30 seconds to Google: “Kagen, lesbian“, and I had all the information I needed to make a fairly accurate assessment of her orientation.... not that there’s anything wrong with that.

But, apparently, back at Harvard, it’s just common knowledge. She’s a lesbian! OK, there. I said it. So, today we have this picture of her playing softball on the cover of the Wall Street Journal and it’s all the rage. The Left is going cookoo for coconuts accusing the WSJ of some subliminal suggestion that, OH MY GOD, Kagen is a lesbian, as if it was ever in doubt. It doesn’t take a genius to figure it out, Sherlock. Like I said, it took me about 30 seconds, (with a slow connection), to confirm my suspicions and I hadn’t even seen that picture of her playing softball. ... but, I knew she was fond of playing it.

Maybe I’m just more astute at these things than all these other folks but I kinda had a suspicion just from looking at her face and then her hard core Leftist politics, her crusade against the Military because of don’t-ask-don’t-tell and viola’, I was dead on target. Well, whut’dya know ‘bout that?  The only evidence missing from that resume was a stint at Planned Parenthood and membership in NOW.

But, oh what a wicked web we weave, when first we practice to deceive. This whole little episode was so obviously orchestrated by the savvy spin scheisters in the Obama liars den, that only a typical Democrat voter couldn’t see the strategy. They picked her because of her orientation in the hopes that the Right-wingers would be caught in the same kind of political correctness trap that Obama used to insulate himself from any and all criticism. If we disagree with her qualifications, it’s because we are just bigots.

It’s a hell-of-a good plan. It almost always works. But this time it was really special because they all knew it, of course, (how could they not?), but they just sat back and pretended not to know it. She’s not only a lesbian, but she’s a closet lesbian. She has total immunity from even the slightest speculation or innuendo. i.e. the softball photo. At least with Obama, nobody could deny his blackness, even though he’s really only half black, but any criticism drew immediate race card privileges from the Left.

I can just see the confirmation hearings now, if some Republican Senator brings up her extra curricula activities, HE’S A BIGOT! He made references to softball! If a Republican Senator asks Kagen how she feels about gays in the military, HE’S A BIGOT! If any Republican Senator even says the word Military, HE’S A BIGOT. He mentioned the Military which is code for “lesbo hates military“! They probably better not even mention Harvard because everyone knows the place is full of lesbos.... BIGOT!! HE MENTIONED HARVARD!!!!

Well, welcome to the freakin' party, Liberals

The esteemed Mr. Eric Holder, the US Attorney General for the Obama administration, has demonstrated his radical left-wing bona fide on several occasions now. If there was any doubt as to his left leaning political ideology, one need only consider Mr. Holder's decision to try the 9/11 masterminds in civilian courts.... in New York City! There is no question the guy is a radical.... I'm referring to the radical Sheik Mohammed, not the radical schmuck Holder. He is a foreign national and was captured in Afcrapistan or some other turd world rat hole and there is no question as to whether or not he is an enemy combatant or should be so designated. He should be tried in a military tribunal and then promptly executed using the most painful process conceivable..... Burned alive at the stake comes to mind. Holder, on the other hand, should just be slapped around a bit and made to crawl on his hands and knees through broken glass to beg forgiveness from the survivors of the 3000 9/11 victims for even suggesting the 9/11 terrorists should be given any rights at all. But, that's just my opinion....
That is why it is very interesting now to see Mr. Holder whining about having to abide by the Miranda Rule, that liberal landmark of judicial activism that said cops are all brutal thugs and that criminals have to be advised of their right not to talk to them. He wants to have the rule changed now, so he can do his job a little bit easier. How convenient. http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/05/10/us/politics/10holder.html

The Miranda Rule stems from the infamous 1966 Supreme Court decision intended to stop cops from using all those terrible interrogation techniques designed to get completely innocent people to confess to crimes they didn't commit. Yep, the black robed soothsayers had watched a few too many B movies that showed the cops "working over" suspects in the interrogation room. Those brilliant legal minds arrived at the mysterious conclusion that the Constitution said, (somewhere), that cops must advise suspects of their rights, and among other things, to have a lawyer, who then invariably tells the suspect to shut up. Case closed, or at least the investigation usually grinds to a screeching halt.

The Robes had spoken. Or, you could say, the Robespierrers had spoken. In any case, as a result of the Miranda decision, cops always have to "read the rights". We've all seen it a kazillion times on TV and people think it is written in the Constitution somewhere that it has to be done. Hint: check it out. It ain't there. As usual, the Robes and legal scholars just say it's there and they'll argue until the cows come home that it is in there, but it ain't.

Therefore, since we are a "nation of laws, not men"....(unless those men are wearing black robes), we are stuck with the iconic dialog, "You have the right to remain silent....". It may as well be part of the damn 10 Commandments. The law enforcement community has learned to live with it and nobody even questions it now.... except Mr. Holder, apparently. Cops have been shackled with this ridiculous impediment to investigative crime fighting for decades. There is no telling how many scumbags have walked, confessions and even slight incriminating statements thrown out because of the exclusionary rule and little technicalities regarding that liberal Miranda decision.

In their overzealous activism to protect criminals from "evil cops" just trying to do their jobs, the public became the ultimate victim of the black robed administrators of "social justice". Cops are bad. Criminals are just victims of a racist system....blah blah blah. We know the liberal mantra. It's better for a thousand murderers to walk free, than to have one innocent person coerced into confessing to a crime he didn't commit by some mean cop saying something like, " Ah come on Joe. Get it off your chest. You'll feel better." Yeah, that was considered a coercive psychological technique.

So, fast forward to 2010 and we have poor ol' liberal Eric Holder who done got himself smack dab between a Barrack and a hard place. Here we have a radical "social justice" liberal Attorney General, to put it mildly, faced with having to deal with this dang ol' Miranda thing for which, of course, he was a strong advocate up until just recently. He wants sooo bad to be a good little smarmy liberal and prosecute all these terrorists in civilian court, but at the same time his entire ideological makeup is screaming to be an advocate for their constitutional rights. How does he sleep at night? Poor thing must be beside himself.

He's being pounded for failing to do his job, but he can't because he wants to treat terrorism like some 7-11 stop-n-rob crime because after all, "we were asking for it". But, to do that, he knows he must abide by that pesky Miranda rule that he loves so much. Oh my. What is a good liberal to do?

It wouldn't be a problem if he'd just hand them over to the CIA, interrogate the hell out of them and then, if they can still breath, give them to the Military to hold until they get around to having some kind of trial..... maybe....someday. All perfectly legal. Even the Robes say that's just hunky dory with them as long as they don't water board them or "torture" them with some other method akin to a frat house hazing ritual.

Frankly, I hope he is successful in getting an exception for the Miranda rule for terrorists suspects. Perhaps it would then open the door for a complete reversal of Miranda which never should have been foisted upon law enforcement in the first place. If it's ok to interrogate a terrorist suspect without his ACLU lawyer present to shut him up, then why not a guy like O.J. Simpson?

We don't need no stinkin' judges.....

But how about a nice fat, ugly closet lesbo? Now, there's a choice for ya, Obama. Just what the country needs on the US Supreme Court...FOR LIFE!
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/elena_kagan_lesbian_rumor_smear_neither_smear_nor_rumor/

Kinda looks like that's his choice, though. Elena Kagan. Yep, a professional student and law professor who has never actually been a real judge herself, but she did play one at Harvard a few times. Her credentials, you ask, to be appointed for life to the nation's highest court?.... Well,.... she's got a lesbian partner and eh.... well, she taught law a LOT... but, hasn't really actually practiced law very much.....or, been an actual judge of any kind, but hey, there's all these vicious rumors out there, (we don't know where they came from...white house),  that she's a closet lesbo. ....OK, that's enough for the Obama administration! Heck yeah! After all, he hasn't really been keeping his promises to that part of his base so far. He needs to shore up the base, ya know. It's time to get all those gaylesbiantransgendercrossdressing perverts back in the tent.

Sure, why not? After all, as the dean of Harvard law school she BANNED THE MILITARY from recruiting on the sacred campus because of their don't-ask-don't-drop-the-soap policy on homos. She's obviously a bona fide LIBERAL and that's enough to become a Supreme Court Justice in Obama's esteemed opinion. Oh yeah, and she did work for the Clinton administration, so heck, she's a shoe-in.

Well, it was enough of a resume for Obama to appoint her to be his Solicitor General, so why not a Supreme Court justice? She did clerk for one once. The little tiny fact that she never actually donned the black robe herself is just insignificant. Who cares about little stuff like that, eh? She did don a white toga a few times in college, most likely. And OH, I bet she looked delicious, don't you?

And who knows, maybe she'll win a Nobel Peace Prize next year for all her brave work to keep the military from recruiting on her campus, or just for having never been a judge but simply because she's always wanted to be one. And we know that's what reeeally matters. It's what's in your heart, and maybe what's on your nose but not what's on your resume.

Ya know, the best part of having Obama as our president is that we get to see just what kind of folks are out there, running our law schools, deciding our laws, in charge of our military, creeping around the back halls of congress and our national security agencies. Ain't it grand?

When in Rome...

So, have ya seen the latest outrage yet?

NBC News, Bay Area, San Francisco, May 6, 2010,
Students Kicked Off Campus for Wearing American Flag Tees

Apparently, some students had to leave campus on the 5th of May for wearing an otherwise uncontroversial and perfectly legal and acceptable shirt representing the USA flag. On any other day of the year, it is perfectly OK, but on a Mexican holiday, (not recognized as such by the Federal, State or local government), the school officials decided it was just too "incindiary". On it's face, the very idea is disturbing. Might cause fights??? Is that not a recognition that there is something terribly wrong with a large segment of the school population?.... not to mention the judgement of the school officials, their own biases and priorities?

Well, it's California after all. We all know the Left coast has been off the reservation for so long now that there is just about nothing they do that would surprise us. A story like this one is a perfect example of why that is.

The 5th of May to most Americans means nothing more than a good excuse to stop off at their local Mexican food restaurant for some enchiladas and refried beans.... Maybe throw back some beers at their favorite pick-up joint. Of course, we can do that just about any old time anyhow, so what's so special to Americans, or shall I say more expressly, United States citizens, about a nationalistic Mexican celebration, their equivalent to our 4th of July, that most of them down there IN Mexico don't even pay much attention to? 

But, for some unexplainable reason, once a Mexican crosses the border into the United States, he suddenly develops a hyper sensitive identity crisis and is "offended" to the point of violence by the mere sight of an American flag on the 5th of May?  Ridiculous as this sounds, it is even more ridiculous for someone born in this country to have such a reaction and to feel "disrespected".

"I think they should apologize cause it is a Mexican Heritage Day," Annicia Nunez, a Live Oak High student, said. "We don't deserve to be get disrespected like that. We wouldn't do that on Fourth of July."

DISRESPECTED???!!!  Well, excuuuuuse me, young lady, but this is after all, still the US of A, last time I checked, and yes that does still include California...or most of it.  Parts of LA, I'm not so sure about these days....

As for her wearing a Mexican flag on the 4th of July, who would give a rip? Go ahead and WEAR ONE!! Make it into a freaking bikini and go strutin' across campus for all I care. Stick a fire cracker up your ass too, while you're at it. .... a very big one. Better yet, a piccolo pete would do nicely and much more befitting of your personality - a loud, whining, screaming mimie.

Then, of course, we must address the school official, a vice-principal Miguel Rodriguez, who decided to demand the removal of the USA flag attire, based on the fear of it causing a fight. I'd like to see someone stick a roman candle up his ass as he is tarred, feathered and run out of town on a really rough rail.

"the administrators called their T-shirts "incendiary" that would lead to fights on campus."

So, due to their "heritage" this select group of students are somehow immune to civil discourse or normal behavior standards? We must treat them on one day of the year as if they are such sensitive children, we must all walk on eggs lest they have a temper tantrum and go off and stab somebody?

If the school didn't allow any political displays, no gang affiliations or colors, no religious expressions and didn't pander to any particular "heritage" other than USA heritage, maybe this little problem would not have reared its ugly head. Maybe if the school system was not engaged in a deconstructivist agenda to denigrate THIS country and it's heritage, perhaps these Americans of another heritage wouldn't be so quick to adopt another country's cultural identity. When in Rome, do as the Romans do or you'll find yourself mucking out their toilets for a living.....if you're lucky. If you're not, well, there may be an opening down at the Coliseum in a lion act......and not as a handler.

I blame the school for allowing the celebration of another sovereign nation's revolution or even the recognition of such on school grounds. Put the kids in uniforms, orange jumpsuits would be appropriate, and make them swear allegiance to the flag of THIS COUNTRY every day. Perhaps that would remind them all where the hell they are and who the hell they are and who the hell is paying for their free freaking education!!

And fire the school administrators responsible for this offensive affront to OUR COUNTRY for "disrespecting us in OUR OWN COUNTRY and causing the situation in the first place by pandering to the nationalistic celebration of another country by a select group, (bigotry much?).  

If schools wish to devote some class time to the mention of Cinco de Mayo as it relates to a general discussion of  other cultures or the relevance of the history of Mexico as it relates to OUR OWN, that would not be a problem. It is when it is allowed to become a celebration on campus equal to, if not bigger and more sacred than the 4th of July, then we have a serious problem.

Is it time for another "gate"? How about "Failure-gate"?

"WASHINGTON (AP) - The no-fly list failed to keep the Times Square suspect off the plane."

So, after 9 years and several failed attempts, and God only knows how much money spent, our national security agencies, airlines employees, ATA and Dept of Justice genius's are still unable to come up with a simple, efficient and user friendly computer data base system, that can be accessed and updated any easier than this blog page. Speaking of gates, where's Bill on this? Hey, Mr. Microsoft, how 'bout you put the geeks to work on this problem for a while. I bet you could make a few more $billion off the Federal Government while solving this apparent mystery of data base wizardry.

How hard can it possibly be to simply allow airline ticket agents issuing boarding passes for any plane allowed to fly in US air space, to log into a central data base, like NCIC, National Crime Information Center, and download the names for a quick check to see if any of them are on the no-fly list?  Or how about, instead of spending their time standing there watching people struggle with that piece of crap self check-in throwback to the Atari for tots terminal, the ticket agents just go back to doing it the old fashioned way of doing it themselves and as they enter the damn name, it automatically gets compared to the NCIC, no-fly list, that can be instantly updated nationwide with the flick of a middle finger on a keyboard in some remote, top secret national security clearing house of Homeland Security information. By the way, the technology existed to do it back in the 70's, if I'm not mistaken.

But, something tells me that political correctness has reared its ugly head once again and that is why we can't just simply input these names to a data base like NCIC.... even for EMERGENCIES!!!  How much ya wanna bet that some damn ACLU lawyer at the DOJ has decided that if you put those names of certain protected class people willy nilly on the list, they might get offended and OH MY GOD we can't have any of that, now can we?  It's just so much more important that we don't offend anyone of any certain, unnamed religion or ethnicity than to actually do ANYTHING remotely sufficient to protect the public at large from being blown into little pieces all over the sky, or even downtown Manhattan.

That bastion of  legendary cover-ups, the 9/11 Commission, has been credited on several resent occasions as having inspired the "connect the dots doctrine" of national security failure excuses. That one accomplishment should be its epitaph because it has been used so many times by the current regime of n'er-do-wells and bungling buffoons as to make the "connect the dots" doctrine a legendary piece of political spin far superior to anything the Clintons devised to evaporate the stain on that infamous blue dress. But I digress....

Since the original sin of Watergate, we've had Monica-gate, File-gate, Travel-gate, Trooper-gate, Tail-gate, Memo-gate, and who could forget Nipple-gate?... and if that weren't enough gates, we now have "no-fly-gate". Or, maybe it will be tagged, "connect the dots-gate", or simply "failure-gate".

I think more appropriately we should just now refer to this whole bungling buffoonery, foisted upon the American people by the Leftist movement, as "Obama-gate". The whole Socialist Democrat, smarmy liberal progressive inspired disaster is culminating in  the worst  "gate" to ever be plastered upon the tabloid pages of popularized political pulp.

But, for now, let's just call it "failure-gate".

3rd Time's the Charm....well, maybe next time

So let's see now. Since the Messiah and his merry band of socialist thugs, tax cheats and incompetent boobs took control of the country, we've had a total of 3 genuine terrorist attacks from Al Qaeda with one of them successful and two of them failures. Of course, neither of those failures can be attributed to the Messiah Administration's Justassed Department or Homeland Insecurity. No,  the safety of We the People has hinged on the momentary incompetence of the morons of the Islamic radical world. In other words, just plain luck.

In the case of the "underpants bomber", his bomb malfunctioned. Had it gone off as planned, several hundred innocent lives would have been destroyed and untold damage done to the airlines industry, AGAIN, and who knows how much damage on the ground.

Of course we know all too tragically that the mass murdering Islamic terrorist at Fort Hood was successful and we all know why. The government failed miserably to detect and remove him from the military due to political correctness, in spite of a long trail of warning signs. Plain and simple. Let's not offend anyone. And, last I heard, nobody has lost his job yet over it. Those 13 innocent murder victims are the direct result of an incompetent, cowardly military command staff, that should be held criminally liable through their gross negligence in kicking that piece of shit down the road to the next unsuspecting commander. And not one thing will be done to change things in the military to prevent something like this from happening again, because the report done to determine the causes, never address them. Islamic terrorism is never mentioned.

And now we have a 3rd incident where the bomb just failed to go off because the idiot didn't use the correct fertilizer and, of course, due to the diligence of our brilliantly enlightened mass media, the terrorist all know why. So, next time they will at least have that part figured out. Thank you, Media for once again being our own worst enemy!

If I were a New Yorker, I'd be scared to death right about now. Your number is up and your mayor is an idiot. "Mayor Bloomberg said that so far there was "no legitimate evidence" the Taliban or al Qaeda were involved."

Apparently they have nabbed the suspect named, as we might have guessed, Faisal Shahzad. What else?
Now, the question remains - will Eric Holder mirandize the puke and give him the name of a good ACLU lawyer, or hand him over to the Military to convict him of treason, since he is a naturalized citizen, and terrorism, since he had ties to a foreign enemy,  and then execute his filthy ass? 

The Throne of Ol' El Patron

Me ol' El Patron could not find a throne,

His plight was nothing but dreadful.
He looked high and low but where could he go?
He feared he'd soon have a pant full.

But then from his chivy he spotted a privy
and knew that it'd just have to do.
He slammed on the pedal until he hit metal
And felt the warm trickle of poo.

With clenched cheeks he ran, from the car to the can.

Eyes bulging he knew this was it.

He reached for the light but oh what a sight

The damn thing was covered in shit.

So into the night he drove with a fright,

The smell in the car it was awful.

His pants now were loose, and leaked like a goose.

And to think the whole thing it was lawful!

He looked for a stop, some place he could plop,

and get into some clean pantelones.

But out of the night came that flashing red light.

All is lost. It's the cops. Ayi cajones!

With lights all a flashing the cops went to bashing.

Me poor El Patron he was dying.

He told them the truth but they knocked out his tooth

And told him they thought he was lying,

So there in the goo, he knew he was through.

No help from these guys he was taking.

It was back to the border and in no short order.

In the Mexican sun he was baking.